|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Some proposed vendor-specific (X-) keysBill Studenmund wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Luben Tuikov wrote: > > > Any time you see ``MAY'' or ``may'' in the draft and a target > > and initiator arrive at different outcomes _just_ by taking one > > or the other route, you have ``compliant-non-interoperability''. > > > > Which is what you are describing in more ``baby-terms'' below. > > No, that's not the same thing. You are saying EVERY may/MAY is a problem. > I disagree with that. I'll agree that SOME may be a problem, and that we > want to find them. > ``Any time'' doesn't imply ``EVERY may/MAY''! Look, I used the conjunctive ``and''. Here: (Every time ... MAY or may) AND (target/initiator arrive at different outcomes) THEN problem. -- Luben
Home Last updated: Mon Jun 10 17:19:14 2002 10644 messages in chronological order |