RE: target reset

[Black_David@emc.com]

> Sorry for being obtuse, but I don't understand your response.
> 
> Are you saying 'yes, cancel all operations == clear task set
> description'
> - or -
> 'yes, the statement has another meaning'
> 

I believe Julian meant the former accompanied by a pointer to
SAM-2 for details on what happens to operations from initiators
other than the one that sent the task management request.  --David
 
 
> On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 09:15, Julian Satran wrote:
>     yes it means cancel all operations - look for the fine differences
>     on cancelling other initiators tasks.
>     That is a SAM issue that we don't want to touch!
>     
>     Julo
>     
>     
>     
>     
>     Michael Morrison
>     <mmorrison@istor.com>
>     Sent by:
>     owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
>     
>     06/12/2002 02:04 AM
>     Please respond to
>     Michael Morrison
>     
>             
>             To:      
>     iSCSI
>     <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
>             cc:        
>             Subject:      
>     target reset
>     
>            
>     
>     
>     On page 148 of draft 12-97, in the paragraph ...
>     
>     "For the TARGET WARM RESET and TARGET COLD RESET functions, the
>     target
>     cancels all pending operations.  Both functions are equivalent to
>     the
>     Target Reset function specified by [SAM2].  They can affect many
>     other
>     initiators"
>     
>     In these cases, SAM2 refers to Logical Unit Reset, which refers to
>     Aborting Tasks.
>     
>     This implies to me that TARGET RESET (WARM or COLD) is 
> equivalent to
>     CLEAR TASK SET.  The behavior in the iSCSI draft for 
> CLEAR TASK SET
>     is
>     fairly well described.  Is the
>     description presented in the discussion on CLEAR TASK SET supposed
>     to
>     define "cancels all pending operations?"  Or does this statement
>     have
>     another meaning?
>     
>     
>     
>     
>