SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: 12-97 Bit Rule



    On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Julian Satran wrote:
    
    One minor question.
    
    > I took out completely the bit rule.
    > I reformulated the CRC text as:
    >
    > The CRC MUST be calculated by a method that produces the same results as
    > the following process:
    >
    >  - The PDU bits are considered as the coefficients of a polyno-mial M(x) of
    > degree n-1; bit 7 of the lowest numbered byte is considered the most
    > significant bit (x^n-1), followed by bit 6 of the lowest numbered byte and
    > through bit 0 of the high-est numbered byte (x^0).
    >
    > - The most significant 32 bits are complemented.
    >
    > - The polynomial is multiplied by x^32 then divided by G(x). The generator
    > polynomial produces a remainder R(x) of degree <= 31.
    >
    > - The coefficients of R(x) are considered a 32 bit sequence.
    >
    > - The bit sequence is complemented and the result is the CRC.
    
    Call the above step 5.
    
    > - the CRC bits are mapped into the digest word - the x^31 coef-ficient in
    > bit 7 of the lowest numbered byte of the digest continuing to through the
    > byte up to the x^24 coefficient in bit 0 of the lowest numbered byte,
    > continuing with the x^23 coefficient in bit 7 of next byte through x^0 in
    > bit 0 of the highest numbered byte.
    >
    > - Computing the CRC over any segment (data or header) extended to include
    > the CRC built using the generator 0x11edc6f41 will get always the value
    > 0x1c2d19ed as its final CRC. This value is given here in its polynomial
    > form - i.e. not mapped as the digest word
    
    About the use of "final CRC" with respect to 0x1c2d19ed. Step 5 says the
    "CRC" is after the complementation, but my experiments indicate that
    0x1c2d19ed is the uncomplimented result, and that the complimented result
    would be 0xe3d2e612. Thus 0xe3d2e612 would be the "CRC."
    
    > I hope you will find it less confusing
    
    I'm not sure what to do. The thoughts which come to my mind take up space.
    The simplest would be to mention what coefficents one uses in well-known
    crc packages. A more complex one would be to include source code, as the
    sctp crc draft did.
    
    Take care,
    
    Bill
    
    


Home

Last updated: Thu Jun 13 20:18:54 2002
10791 messages in chronological order