|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI: FirstBurstSize and unsolicited dataI didn't say to put a requirement on it ... I just said maybe the initiator should have done that. What good is a FirstBurstSize of 64k if you can't send it? Maybe I'm missing something. Eddy -----Original Message----- From: Bill Studenmund [mailto:wrstuden@wasabisystems.com] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:58 PM To: Eddy Quicksall Cc: Nandakumar Ramamurthy; ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: iSCSI: FirstBurstSize and unsolicited data On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Eddy Quicksall wrote: > The initiator should probably reduce FirstBurstSize to 8k. > > Although the spec does not seem to mandate this. Why? I don't see how that helps us (forcing it to be 8k, or MaxRecvPDUDataSize), because immediate data are bounded by both FirstBurstSize and MaxRecvPDUDataSize. i.e. we will always have to check both. So putting a requirement that FirstBurstSize not be over 8k (or MaxRecvPDUDataSize) doesn't mean we can skip checking immediate data size against both FirstBurstSize and MaxRecvPDUDataSize, but it means we would need to add code to login to check this bounding. How does this help us? Take care, Bill
Home Last updated: Fri Jun 14 18:18:47 2002 10833 messages in chronological order |