RE: iSCSI - Length and Size

To: "'Julian Satran'" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: iSCSI - Length and Size
From: David Dillard <david.dillard@veritas.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:05:18 -0400
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C21C59.40487E38"
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

The change of size to length was made for the sake of consistency. Shouldn't the goal be that the document/protocol is totally consistent, not mostly consistent? Don't go half way...

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:54 AM
To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: iSCSI - Length and Size

I've changed all occurrences of "size" to "length" in the draft.
Do we want also to change FirstBurstSize and MaxBurstSize to FirstBurstLength and MaxBurstLength? (for good size ... oops ... length)

Julo

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-string-prep-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: iSCSI - Length and Size
Prev by thread: Re: iSCSI - Length and Size
Next by thread: Re: iSCSI - Length and Size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Jun 25 12:18:48 2002
10979 messages in chronological order