|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] iSCSI: leading zeros and decimal-encoded binary stringsHere's the heart of what I dislike about decimal-encoded binary strings: how do you convey the length of the binary string when you have leading zero bits? -14 says: "When used to encode binary strings decimal constants have an implicit byte-length that is the minimum number of bytes needed to represent the base2 encoding of the decimal number." How do leading zeros impact the "base2 encoding .."? Consider "012". Obviously the number is 12. The question is how many bytes are in the binary string? Is it one, since a number of three decimal digit numbers fit in one byte (up to "255"), or is it two bytes in the string since other three-decimal-digit numbers won't fit in one byte ("256" through "999")? The spec isn't clear, at least not to me. Ok, so one or two-byte strings aren't that likely. The problem though is that all of the byte sizes don't line up nicely with decimal digits (since 2^x = 10^y only works for x=0, y=0 AFAIK). Since we can't force that binary strings don't start with a zero-byte (or two), we need to support some way of communicating how long such a string is. Two suggestions: 1) Rip out the decimal binary strings bit 2) Come up with a table saying if you have so many digits which contain leading zeros, you have a binary string of so many bytes. Examples: String: Bytes in binary string: 00000000000000000012 8 00072057594037927935 8 00000000000000012 7 00281474976710655 7 000000000000012 6 001099511627775 6 0000000000012 5 0004294967295 5 0000000012 4 0016777215 4 00000012 3 00065535 3 00012 2 00255 2 The advantage of such a method is that you can easily force the right number of leading zeros with printf format strings. For instance, printf("%010d", an-int32-type) will do the right thing. But we need to communicate that in the spec, and we don't. Thoughts? Take care, Bill P.S. I will be on vacation starting tomorrow through the weekend.
Home Last updated: Tue Jul 02 19:18:45 2002 11087 messages in chronological order |