SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI -DLB comments



    
    Julian,
    please do not be too quick to follow the suggestion regarding T6.   Ayman,
    had a valid point.
    
    .
    .
    .
    John L. Hufferd
    Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
    IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
    Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
    Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702
    Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
    
    
    Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL@ece.cmu.edu on 07/07/2002 08:13:47 AM
    
    Sent by:    owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    
    
    To:    ips@ece.cmu.edu, Black_David@emc.com
    cc:
    Subject:    iSCSI -DLB comments
    
    
    
    
    David,
    
    I have posted fixes for T1 to T10 and keep working on the rest (I could not
    devote enough time today to iSCSI).
    With regard to T11 the text you quote specifies only the "implicit length".
    The encoding length specified later in 4.1 for binary and large-binary says
    that the
    length can be either implicit or explicit. The examples you quote can
    be/are solved with an explicit length.
    
    As I said we considered forbidding decimals several times but that would be
    a total departure from the RFC "tradition".
    
    Julo
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Sun Jul 07 14:18:53 2002
11159 messages in chronological order