RE: iSCSI: DLB's Comment on SCSI Port Names

To: "'Jim Hafner'" <hafner@almaden.ibm.com>, "'Black_David@emc.com'" <Black_David@emc.com>
Subject: RE: iSCSI: DLB's Comment on SCSI Port Names
From: "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:22:44 -0700
Cc: "'ips@ece.cmu.edu'" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C226E7.209EBCD0"
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

Correction - 244 characters max node name would provide for a 255 max port name = (244 char name + ",i," + "0x000000") (How did ISID get so big ;-)

If strings over 256 characters are a problem for some platforms, I'd be in favor of reducing the max iSCSI node name to 249 characters so the maximum SCSI port name would be 255 characters total (249 char name + ",i," + "0x0000")

Prev by Date: RE: iSCSI: DLB's Comment on SCSI Port Names
Next by Date: iSCSI - pause
Prev by thread: Re: iSCSI: DLB's Comment on SCSI Port Names
Next by thread: RE: iSCSI: DLB's Comment on SCSI Port Names
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Jul 09 11:18:54 2002
11206 messages in chronological order