|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: DLB's [T.6] 2.3 iSCSI Session Types
I'm not sure what Mark means by "we", but I am opposed to any dynamic
discovery mechanisms for SendTargets because of my belief that these
mechanisms does not belong here. Therefore I vote against Noop and Async
messages,
Sincerely,
Prasenjit Sarkar
Research Staff Member
IBM Almaden Research
San Jose
Mark Bakke
<mbakke@cisco.com To: Black_David@emc.com
> cc: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, ips@ece.cmu.edu
Sent by: Subject: Re: iSCSI: DLB's [T.6] 2.3 iSCSI Session Types
owner-ips@ece.cmu
.edu
07/11/2002 08:21
AM
Actually, we want to be able to send Async Message and Noop In
from the target, and allow the initiator to send Noop Out, since
these are more in the iSCSI session maintenance category of
messages.
There's definitely no reason to allow Scsi Command / Response,
Task Management Command / Response, Data In/Out, Snack, and
R2T on a discovery session.
--
Mark
Black_David@emc.com wrote:
>
> Julian
>
> > I can agree with MUST but I will resist adding any notification.
> >
> > It is just the wrong thing to do.
>
> I don't care - getting to a MUST with a list of allowed PDUs that
> forbids all others from the current MAY that allows everything is
> what matters to me.
>
> At the moment, I've only seen Ayman ask for Async Message to be
> allowed on discovery sessions - does anyone else want to see that
> PDU allowed on discovery sessions?
>
> Thanks,
> --David
> ---------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748
> +1 (508) 249-6449 FAX: +1 (508) 497-8018
> black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ---------------------------------------------------
--
Mark A. Bakke
Cisco Systems
mbakke@cisco.com
763.398.1054
Home Last updated: Fri Jul 12 15:19:01 2002 11304 messages in chronological order |