|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: IPS-ALL: FC Mgmt MIB WG Last CallKeith,
Duane, > OK, I understand that this MIB is a replacement for both draft-ietf-ipfc- > fcmgmt-int-mib-07.txt and RFC 2837, and it appears to be an excellent > effort relative to these objectives and in fixing the many problems in the > original MIBs. But I also assume one of the priorities of this WG is to > identify the migration path for users of the new MIB, which is why I raised > the issue. (I also raised the same issue back in April of this year.) > > The ability to discover a management URL is important and is widely used > today. Can you help in bringing this requirement to the Entity MIB WG? Or As I indicated in my previous message, I already did what you're asking for; I took the requirement for each of the removed objects to the Entity MIB WG. Some of them have since been adopted there. For the others, perhaps I didn't explain the requirement for them as well as you could. Nevertheless, I believe it will take a sustained effort to get them not only adopted but progressed to standardization. I'm sorry but I don't have the time or motivation for such a sustained effort. In contrast, you seem to be motivated; so, the question is: do you have the time ?? Keith. > maybe as you mention, a management MIB is a better approach - but is there > such an effort underway? The concept of a management URL object could > definitely be improved on relative to "connUnitUrl", such as allowing > multiple URL entries. > > Duane Baldwin >
Home Last updated: Tue Jul 30 10:39:08 2002 11481 messages in chronological order |