Draft consistency Q, was Re: Regarding CSG and NSG

[Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@wasabisystems.com>]

On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Nandakumar Ramamurthy wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The following statement specifies the target's action.
>
> Section 4.3 of draft-14 says :
>
>    "If the initiator is willing to negotiate security, but is unwilling
>    to make the initial parameter offer and may accept a connection with-
>    out security, it issues the Login with the T bit set to 1, the CSG
>    set to SecurityNegotiation, and NSG set to LoginOperationalNegotia-
>    tion. If the target is also ready to forego security, the Login
>    response is empty and has T bit set to 1, the CSG set to SecurityNe-
>    gotiation, and NSG set to LoginOperationalNegotiation."

I see a potential draft conflict between this text and the text about
TargetPortalGroupFlag in section 4.3.1. The latter says that the
TargetPortalGroupFlag SHOULD be sent in the first Login Response, which
would be the "empty" one above. :-)

What do we want to do?

Take care,

Bill