|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI : Login response with zero DataSegmentLengthPriya, The answer you suggest in step 4 is correct - as you are required to conclude the negotiation. If your answer would have had T=0 and a zero length Data Segment that would have violated the rule you quote. Basically the rule is there to help avoid unnecessary traffic. Julo
Hi all,
Consider the following scenario.
1) I -> T : login request: T=0, csg = 1, some text parameters that require negotiation 2) I <- T : login response: T = 0, csg = 1, response for the initiator's text parameters + target's own text parameters that require negotiation. 3) I -> T : login request: T = 1, csg = 1, nsg = 3, response for the parameters proposed by the target in step 2
Assume that at the end of the login request in step 3 all text parameters that need negotiation have been negotiated correctly at both ends. Is it valid for the target to send a login response as follows signifying the end of login phase? If not, what should be the correct response from the target ?
4) I <- T : login response : T=1, csg = 1, nsg = 3, DataSegmentLength = 0
I observed that the draft says that "A target or initiator SHOULD NOT use a Text or Login Response or Text or Login Request with no data segment (DataSegmentLength 0) unless explicitly required by a general or a key-specific negotiation rule."
To me the above scenario does not seem to be covered by this rule. Please clarify.
Thanks Priya
Home Last updated: Fri Sep 06 09:18:57 2002 11784 messages in chronological order |