|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last CallDave is 100% correct. During the development of FCIP the issue of discovery mechanisms was considered in detail. The decision was that iSNS is too heavy weight a discovery protocol for FCIP needs and SLPv2 was chosen and documented as the best fit solution. Suggesting in iSNS that there is a relationship with FCIP will lead to confusion when no supporting discussion can be found in the FCIP RFC. No changes are required in iSNS. Thanks. .Ralph Dave Peterson wrote: > I object. > The FCIP group discussed this issue and agreed that SLPv2 was to be used for > FCIP Entity discovery. > As such, the recently completed FCIP draft contains no mention of iSNS > support. > A single dynamic discovery protocol is needed and its SLPv2. > > ...dap > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of > > Anil Rijhsinghani > > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:05 AM > > To: 'Joshua Tseng'; ips@ece.cmu.edu > > Subject: RE: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call > > > > > > Joshua: > > > > Unless there are objections, it would be useful to add those hooks as an > > option. In an environment where both FCIP and iSCSI are in use, > > and iSNS is > > available, it may help to keep down the number of discovery protocols that > > need to be managed by the user. Either SLP could be used for > > both, or iSNS. > > > > Anil > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joshua Tseng [mailto:jtseng@NishanSystems.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:08 PM > > To: Anil Rijhsinghani; Black_David@emc.com; ips@ece.cmu.edu > > Subject: RE: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call > > > > > > Anil, > > > > It would be very easy, especially now that Portals can be > > members of Discovery Domains. All we would need to do is > > to add a new Entity Protocol type (FCIP = 3). FCIP connectivity > > would then be established based on Portal membership in > > Discovery Domains. Other than that, we would just new narative > > text describing how you use iSNS to set up FCIP sessions. > > > > Please let me know if this is desireable for the FCIP folks. > > > > Josh > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Anil Rijhsinghani [mailto:anil.rijhsinghani@mcdata.com] > > > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:43 PM > > > To: 'Black_David@emc.com'; ips@ece.cmu.edu > > > Subject: RE: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call > > > > > > > > > How hard would it be to add hooks for optional FCIP support > > > in iSNS? It > > > currently supports only iFCP and iSCSI. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Anil > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com] > > > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:07 AM > > > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > > > Subject: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > We would like to announce IPS Working Group Last call for > > > the Internet Storage Name Service (iSNS). > > > > > > Details: > > > > > > Document: Internet Storage Name Service (iSNS) > > > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ips-isns-13.txt > > > Note: There are formatting (line length) problems with this draft. > > > It may get updated to -14 shortly to correct them without > > > change to its content. > > > > > > Last call period: 2 Weeks > > > Submit comments no later than: Sunday, October 13, 2002 at 5pm EST > > > Editor: Josh Tseng <jtseng@nishansystems.com> > > > > > > Please submit editorial comments directly to Josh, with copy > > > to David Black > > > (black_david@emc.com), and Elizabeth Rodriguez(erodrigu@brocade.com) > > > Submit technical comments to the IPS mailing list (ips@ece.cmu.edu) > > > > > > Editorial comments may be resolved directly by the editor of > > > the document, > > > but any technical issues must be discussed on the IPS reflector. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > David Black & Elizabeth Rodriguez > > > IPS co-chairs > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > David L. Black, Senior Technologist > > > EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > > > +1 (508) 249-6449 FAX: +1 (508) 497-8018 > > > black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > Notice > > > > > > All information transmitted hereby is intended only for the use of the > > > addressee(s) named above and may contain confidential and privileged > > > information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > > > distribution is > > > prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the > > > intended recipient(s) > > > or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the > > > intended recipient(s), you may not distribute or copy this > > > communication to > > > another. Anyone who receives this communication in error > > > should notify us > > > immediately by telephone and mail the original message to us > > > at the above > > > address and destroy all copies. > > > =========================================================== > > > > > > > > > =========================================================== > > Notice > > > > All information transmitted hereby is intended only for the use of the > > addressee(s) named above and may contain confidential and privileged > > information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is > > prohibited. If the reader of this message is not the intended > > recipient(s) > > or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the > > intended recipient(s), you may not distribute or copy this > > communication to > > another. Anyone who receives this communication in error should notify us > > immediately by telephone and mail the original message to us at the above > > address and destroy all copies. > > ===========================================================
Home Last updated: Wed Oct 09 10:19:03 2002 11933 messages in chronological order |