RE: iSCSI: LUN in a ping

[Eddy Quicksall <eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com>]

Yes, I remember that but the necessity for the target to set it should be up
to the target because the initiator should not be trying to interpret it (it
should only be required to echo it).

Is there a case where the initiator will interpret the LUN?

Eddy

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Satran [mailto:julian@cs.haifa.ac.il]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:43 AM
To: 'Eddy Quicksall'; ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: iSCSI: LUN in a ping


TTT & LUN uniquely identify the "origin" (if target is a "composite"
each of the parts can issue their own TTTs - no coordination needed).

Regards,
Julo


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of
Eddy Quicksall
Sent: 22 January, 2003 00:07
To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: iSCSI: LUN in a ping


Does anyone know why we added "the LUN must be valid" for a target
initiated ping? It would seem that it is N/A when the ping is just being
used to checkup on the connection.
 
What will the initiator do with the LUN anyway?
 
10.19.3 LUN
A LUN MUST be set to a correct value when the Target Transfer Tag is
valid (not the reserved value 0xffffffff).
 
Eddy
mailto: Eddy_Quicksall@iVivity.com