|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: numeric-range format question (pedantic)Yes the safe assumption is c. Julo
Is it draft 20's intent that any numeric-range may be represented by a single numerical-value, if that value is the only one acceptable? I ask because: -- the definition for numeric-range does not mention this (5.1) -- OFMarkInt and IFMarkInt are defined as <numeric-range> for offers (A.3.2) -- .. but the description for these keys says "In case it only wants a specific value, only a single value has to be specified". There are three conclusions I might make: a) When the draft says "only a single value has to be specified", it means only that (for instance) 4096~4096 might be specified. b) x is valid shorthand for x~x, but only for OFMarkInt and IFMarkInt c) x is valid shorthand for x~x, for any theoretical numeric-range The safest choice is obviously c). If the intent was actually a), would somebody please speak up. Thanks, --buck
Home Last updated: Wed Feb 05 19:19:23 2003 12292 messages in chronological order |