|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Protocol Action: iSCSI to Proposed Standard*> *> The IESG has approved publishing the following Internet-Draft *> as a Proposed Standard: *> *> o iSCSI <draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-20.txt> *> *> This document is the product of the IP Storage Working Group. *> *> The IESG contact persons are Allison Mankin and Scott Bradner. *> *> *> Technical Summary *> *> The Small Computer Systems Interface (SCSI) is a family of *> protocols for communicating with I/O devices, especially storage *> devices. SCSI is a client-server architecture. The SCSI protocol *> has been mapped over various transports, including Parallel SCSI, Transports? The Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines the noun "transport" as "strong and often intensely pleasurable emotion". ;-) All the Internet documentation with which I am familiar, as well as the OSI reference model, define a "transport layer", but I don't think you are suggesting SCSI over IP, etc. Can't we please resist terminology pollution? In the IETF we call these [data] link layers. Bob Braden *> IPI, IEEE-1394 (firewire) and Fibre Channel. These transports are *> I/O specific and have limited distance capabilities. The iSCSI *> protocol defined in draft-ietf-ips-iscsi describes a means of *> transporting of the SCSI packets over TCP/IP, providing for an *> interoperable solution which can take advantage of existing *> Internet infrastructure, Internet management facilities and *> address distance limitations. Mapping over TCP ensures that the *> high volume storage transfers use congestion control. *> *>
Home Last updated: Wed Feb 12 15:19:16 2003 12303 messages in chronological order |