Re: iSCSI: version number

To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: iSCSI: version number
From: "Sankar, Ranga" <Ranga.Sankar@netapp.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:22:33 -0500
Cc: <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>, "Wysochanski, David" <David.Wysochanski@netapp.com>
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2D92E.90B75AC3"
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Thread-Index: AcLZLpDDfNXLy0UkRhKZk9f4XaSzzA==
Thread-Topic: Re: iSCSI: version number

Title: Re: iSCSI: version number

Could we leave the version number as 0? Is there a strong reason to make this 1?

-ranga

"Robert D. Russell" <rdr@io.iol.unh.edu>
20/02/03 16:59
To Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
cc ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject iSCSI: version number

Julian:

Now that draft 20 has been accepted as an IETF standard,
shouldn't the version number in section 10.12.4 be changed
to 0x01?

Thanks

Bob Russell
InterOperability Lab
University of New Hampshire
rdr@iol.unh.edu
603-862-3774

Follow-Ups:
- Re: iSCSI: version number
  - From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
- Re: iSCSI: version number
  - From: dave wysochanski <davidw@netapp.com>

Home

Last updated: Fri Feb 21 13:19:14 2003
12350 messages in chronological order