Re: WG last call on <draft-ietf-dhc-isnsoption-04.txt> (Reminder!)

[Franco Travostino <travos@nortelnetworks.com>]

I support the draft.

An observation regarding IPv4 vs IPv6. Other DHCP documents make it clear 
that they are talking about IPv4 use (e.g., rfc 3361, ""Dynamic Host 
Configuration Protocol (DHCP-for-IPv4) Option for Session Initiation 
Protocol (SIP) Servers""). If there is an agreed-upon style for defining 
applicability, it should be used here as well.

-franco



At 01:23 PM 2/20/2003, Ralph Droms wrote:
>Reminder and note: there has been not response to this WG last 
>call.  Please review draft-ietf-dhc-isnsoption-04.txt and reply with 
>comments.  If you recommend the document for advancement without revision, 
>please respond with a quick acknowledgment.  No response will be 
>interpreted as a lack of support for advancing the document.
>
>-----
>
>This message announces a WG last call on "DHCP Options for Internet 
>Storage Name Service" <draft-ietf-dhc-isnsoption-04.txt>.  The last call 
>will conclude on Friday, 2/21.
>
>Note that this is a parallel WG last call in the dhc and ips WGs.
>
>draft-ietf-dhc-isnsoption-04.txt defines a new DHCP option for discovery 
>of the location and role of iSNS Protocol servers in iSCSI and iFCP 
>devices.  The draft is available at 
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-isnsoption-04.txt
>
>- Ralph Droms