|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: Are there any coming iSCSI HBAs? Preferably at 100Mb speed?Actually, Julian is very close to what I envision. I have 3 old computers currently, and plan to have more soon. It's frustrating to have my disk space spread across multiple devices. My long-range target is to have a single iSCSI Target computer, with multiple other computers (both legacy computers and new) booting off of iSCSI disks. All computers will be diskless except for the iSCSI target. The iSCSI Target will pool all of my available storage, as well as do RAID protection. Of course, this works best when the iSCSI target machine implements storage overallocation, point-in-time flash copy, and other advanced features. I know that I could, for some purposes, just boot off of NFS, but I would prefer a solution that allows me to install legacy OSes on legacy computers - and to install modern OSes without software changes. For example, I have one computer that I use just to keep an eye on RedHat's latest version. Every few months, I do a complete reinstall with RedHat's net-install process. If that has the capability to install on a remote NFS share, I don't know how... |---------+----------------------------> | | Robert Snively | | | <rsnively@Brocade| | | .COM> | | | | | | 04/15/2003 08:34 | | | AM | | | | |---------+----------------------------> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "'Julian Satran'" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>, Sukanta ganguly <sganguly@yahoo.com> | | cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu, Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM>, Russell Lewis/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS| | Subject: RE: Are there any coming iSCSI HBAs? Preferably at 100Mb speed? | | | >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| What you have described is not a diskless environment. It is a disk-full environment with local disks, a well supported and very cheap environment that receives no benefit from iSCSI and is frequently implemented with traditional SCSI or ATA and will soon be implemented with SATA. If you create the local iSCSI home target, you still have not provided the diskless environment to the legacy hosts you intend to attach to that target. If you have more than one such host, you must introduce non-legacy software and management tools. In most cases, you could have just attached your $500 brick directly and saved yourself the cost (and hassle of managing) the extra Linux PC target. It looks to me like we still have some confusion interpreting Russell's original intent. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 10:50 PM To: Sukanta ganguly Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu; owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu; Robert Snively; 'Russell Lewis' Subject: RE: Are there any coming iSCSI HBAs? Preferably at 100Mb speed? We did run "informal" tests using Windows/Office+Personal-Web-server (a usual home/SOHO setup) on switched 100Mb/s (also common at home). The disks we attached to where better than the ordinary desktop IDE drives (we where using the now defunct 200i - but I have seen an inexpensive small array (looks like a larger brick two weeks ago at Fry's for $500 - if you put those behind a (not very old) PC running Linux you can have a decent and inexpensive home target). Webserver and Office where showing better numbers - and the perceived response time on clients was better. Julo Sukanta ganguly <sganguly@yahoo.com> To 15/04/03 05:23 Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM> cc ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu, Russell Lewis/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Subject RE: Are there any coming iSCSI HBAs? Preferably at 100Mb speed? Hi, For a diskless environment multiple other issues have to come into play, i.e Network based remote boot logic, proper downlod of enough Operating System code onto the diskless box etc. Julo, what kinds of numbers did you folks see ? What is your environment like ? I am a little perplexed with the high speed connection to the remote disks via iSCSI. Thanks SG --- Julian Satran <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com> wrote: > Bob, > > I wonder if your opinion is based on real experience > or prejudice. > Our measurements indicate that an inexpensive box > with SCSI disks performs > BETTER than an IDE (typical) desktop drive > using iSCSI over a 100MB/s connection (widely > available for home use) - > and that includes paging (usually marginal) and all > the rest. > > Julo > > > > Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM> > Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu > 14/04/03 18:06 > > To > Russell Lewis/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS, ips@ece.cmu.edu > cc > > Subject > RE: Are there any coming iSCSI HBAs? Preferably at > 100Mb speed? > > > > > > > My experience with diskless workstations is that > they are limited by paging activity and background > updating to really unacceptable performance, even in > > simple word-processing programs like frame maker > doing medium sized books, and even on a local 10 > Mb/s > network. > You are far better off running a workstation with > a local disk for system and swap, but running > dataless. NFS or comparable networking programs > run fine for that. The local caching of the files > on disk and in memory assure adequate performance, > while > the maintenance of your data remotely assures > appropriate centralized data management and backup. > Remember too, that it is a rare broadband connection > > that gives you anything approaching 100 Mb/s. A T1 > DSL link > is specified at 1.54 Mb/s, and it is the fastest of > the > common broadband links. > In addition, there is nothing more frustrating than > being > unable to operate because your link is down or > severely > congested, something that happens far more often > than the > unavailability of a local disk. > My view? iSCSI is not an appropriate protocol for > home > networking data access. Use your IDE or SATA drive > locally > for boot, swap, system, and any hot programs and use > > NFS or other remote file access program against a > remote > server for data and other programs. > Bob Snively > 408-333-8135 > rsnively@brocade.com > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russell Lewis [mailto:russelll@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 9:25 AM > > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > > Subject: Are there any coming iSCSI HBAs? > Preferably at 100Mb speed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anybody know of any current or coming iSCSI > HBAs which > > show up (to the > > BIOS) as ordinary SCSI adapters? I'd like to drop > such an HBA into a > > legacy computer and run a totally diskless > workstation at home. > > > > However, since it will be a home computer, I'm > willing to > > operate at 100Mb > > speed - I'm willing to eat the performance hit. > It seems to me that > > somebody could make an iSCSI HBA with a 100Mb > interface and make it > > affordable for the home user (say, $50-$100). > Anybody know > > of such plans? > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com
Home Last updated: Tue Apr 15 14:19:17 2003 12504 messages in chronological order |