Julian,
Can you comment on this?
I would like to not have to report the
TargetPortalGroupTag during a discovery session.
Eddy
-----Original Message-----
From: Eddy Quicksall
[mailto:eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com]
Sent: Friday,
May 23, 2003 4:23 PM
To: KRUEGER,MARJORIE
(HP-Roseville,ex1); Ips@Ece.Cmu.Edu (ips@ece.cmu.edu)
Subject: RE: iSCSI:
TargetPortalGroupTag for discovery
The definition of SSID says this:
The TargetPortalGroupTag key must also be
returned
the target as a confimation (typo) during
connection establishment.
Eddy
-----Original Message-----
From: KRUEGER,MARJORIE
(HP-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:marjorie.krueger@hp.com]
Sent: Friday,
May 23, 2003 4:16 PM
To: 'Eddy Quicksall';
Ips@Ece.Cmu.Edu (ips@ece.cmu.edu)
Subject: RE: iSCSI:
TargetPortalGroupTag for discovery
I
think the wording in the spec says TargetPortalGroupTag should be
included in the Login response. It seems that a discovery session
where multiple targets are being serviced by the same IP address
is a case where TargetPortalGroupTag need not be reported? The intent
behind reporting TargetPortalGroupTag is directed towards Full Feature Sessions
so that the initiator can verify that it's discovery information is still
valid.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eddy Quicksall
[mailto:eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com]
Sent: Friday,
May 23, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Ips@Ece.Cmu.Edu
(ips@ece.cmu.edu)
Subject: iSCSI:
TargetPortalGroupTag for discovery
I have a question regarding the
determination of the Target Portal Group Tag during a discovery session when
the TargetName is not supplied.
The TargetPortalGroupTag must be reported
in the first Login Response for all session types. But without the TargetName,
how does the network entity determine which Target Portal Group Tag to report
if two different targets in the network entity are using the same IP
Address/TCP Port?
Eddy
