|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: question about iscsiTgtPortalAttributesTableHi Bill, No, I am not indicating that we are re-opening the MIB up for more work. The issue presented here is that there is a fundamental problem in the current MIB -- "... iscsiIntrPortalAttributesTable should be deleted as there is no such thing as an initiator portal group tag (Marj)". As such, this is something that I believe needs to be corrected. The MIB itself has completed work in the working group (e.g. the WG signed off on the MIB when last call was completed), and only necessary and minor (e.g. does not change the fundamentals of what the WG has already agreed to) changes can be made at this time, with the concurrence of the WG chairs and the approval of the Area Directors. Elizabeth Rodriguez IPS co-chair -----Original Message----- From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of wrstuden@wasabisystems.com Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:20 PM To: Elizabeth G. Rodriguez Cc: 'KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)'; 'Venkat Movva'; mbakke@cisco.com; black_david@emc.com; 'Ips@Ece.Cmu.Edu'; 'Michele Hallak - Stamler' Subject: RE: question about iscsiTgtPortalAttributesTable On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Elizabeth G. Rodriguez wrote: > Hi Marj, > > > > The current status of the draft is that it has been forwarded to Allison for > AD review. Not sure where she is with respect to that review yet. > > We need to decide what the change needs to be and ping Allison on what she > would prefer - another draft right now, or wait until her review is > complete, in case other changes need to be made. If we're talking about opening the MIB up for more work, one issue I'd like to see addressed is how to configure "self" auths. i.e. we have a way to configure the auths we expect from the other side, how do we configure the auths we offer for our authentication? Take care, Bill
Home Last updated: Thu Jun 05 22:19:22 2003 12618 messages in chronological order |