|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI: Login RedirectI think if anything the spec could simply state that an effort should be made by target implementers to use the minimum number of redirects possible to get a operation done given what the redirects are being used for. The above however is just common sense and hence doesn't need to be explicitly stated in the spec. I don't think an exact minimum or maximum needs to be or can be documented in the spec. Some consideration and wording may want to go into the spec regarding cyclic redirects. -Shawn -----Original Message----- From: Caitlin Bestler [mailto:cait@asomi.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:50 PM To: Bob Gilligan Cc: Mallikarjun C.; ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: iSCSI: Login Redirect In order to cover the type of fault-tolerance scenario you cited wouldn't it make sense to set a minimum that the initiator SHOULD be willing to accept? That way cluster builders would have a base that they could assume would not result in iniator failures (only delays).
Home Last updated: Tue Aug 05 12:46:11 2003 12771 messages in chronological order |