SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI/iWARP drafts and flow control


    • To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
    • Subject: RE: iSCSI/iWARP drafts and flow control
    • From: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <elliott@hp.com>
    • Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:05:19 -0500
    • content-class: urn:content-classes:message
    • Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    • Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
    • Delivered-To: ips-outgoing@sos.ece.cmu.edu
    • Delivered-To: ips-outgoing@ece.cmu.edu
    • Delivered-To: ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu
    • Delivered-To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    • Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    • Thread-Index: AcNUqBBzbjItvSxPQ3y5Q19HlDVc8wAaLLTw
    • Thread-Topic: iSCSI/iWARP drafts and flow control

    Note that SCSI asynchronous events were declared obsolete by T10 in
    November 2002 and have not been documented in SCSI Architecture Model -
    3 (SAM-3) since revision 3 (the latest revision is 8).
    
    --
    Rob Elliott, elliott@hp.com
    Hewlett-Packard Industry Standard Server Storage Advanced Technology
    https://ecardfile.com/id/RobElliott
    
    
    
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Mike Ko [mailto:mako@almaden.ibm.com] 
    > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:31 PM
    > To: Caitlin Bestler
    > Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > Subject: Re: iSCSI/iWARP drafts and flow control
    > 
    > 
    > Caitlin, it looks like as far as iSCSI asynchronous messages are 
    > concerned, we both agree that "setting limits on most of the 
    > types listed 
    > is so easy that there is no need to negotiate the limit".  So 
    > the only 
    > other item is the SCSI asynchronous events, and the question 
    > yet to be 
    > answered is how many AENs can realistically be sent at one 
    > time.  Since 
    > the optional Shared Receive Queue already provides a solution 
    > to handling 
    > this situation without impacting the iSCSI spec, does anyone 
    > else thinks 
    > that the handling of AENs justify adding a negotiable item to 
    > set a hard 
    > limit on the number of AENs?
    > 
    > Mike Ko
    > IBM Almaden Research
    > San Jose, CA 95120
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Aug 05 12:46:09 2003
12771 messages in chronological order