|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI/iWARP drafts and flow controlDavid, on your suggestion on "specifying a non-negotiable limit on the number that can be outstanding", is that with the WG chair hat on? Mike Ko IBM Almaden Research San Jose, CA 95120 Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: elliott@hp.com, ips@ece.cmu.edu cc: Subject: RE: iSCSI/iWARP drafts and flow control Rob, > Note that SCSI asynchronous events were declared obsolete by > T10 in November 2002 and have not been documented in SCSI > Architecture Model - 3 (SAM-3) since revision 3 (the latest > revision is 8). iSCSI is based on SAM-2, which includes SCSI asynchronous events, and moving it to SAM-3 is going to involve other changes (e.g., to task management). That's not planned to happen any time soon, but the fact that T10 considers SCSI asynchronous events obsolete is more than adequate justification for specifying a non-negotiable limit on the number that can be outstanding. Also, let me caution everyone that the iSER and DA drafts are not approved work items of the IP Storage WG. Since they're related to iSCSI, I suppose discussion on this list is ok, but I have no idea if or when they may become drafts that this WG works on. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ----------------------------------------------------
Home Last updated: Tue Aug 05 12:46:09 2003 12771 messages in chronological order |