Re: transport protocols

To: rdv@Network-Alchemy.COM
Subject: Re: transport protocols
From: Aman Singla <aman@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:24:37 -0800
CC: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivery-Date: Wed Mar 22 22:27:12 2000
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
References: <200003180156.RAA10016@manganese.network-alchemy.com>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


> * ST: a nice, lightweight protocol, but I'm concerned about a)
>   assumptions about a reliable link layer, b) latency sensitivity, c)
>   congestion control.  Probably fine in a LAN, not useful in a WAN.

ST doesn't require reliable link layer.
What do you mean by being concerned about latency sensitivity?

:a

References:
- transport protocols
  - From: Rod Van Meter <rdv@Network-Alchemy.COM>

Prev by Date: bibliography
Next by Date: Re: bibliography
Prev by thread: transport protocols
Next by thread: Re: transport protocols
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:08:16 2001
6315 messages in chronological order