|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: FC/IP vs. iSCSIScott, I will not argue that point. But my point in that email is not that it could not be put integrated onto an end device, but that it is not the intent. The focus is to bridge existing deployments over IP and address limitations in the physical media. Elizabeth -----Original Message----- From: Scott Bradner [mailto:sob@harvard.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 6:15 AM To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: FC/IP vs. iSCSI Elizabeth sez: > e.g. I would not > expect someone to put FC over IP into an end device. It is really intended > to be something put into a switch, not at an endpoint. I would expect vendors to do anything that they think will sell and I expect that some vendors would think that connecting a FC endpoint to a FC switch over IP would sell Scott
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:50 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |