Re: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)

To: "Douglas Otis" <dotis@sanlight.net>
Subject: Re: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
From: csapuntz@cisco.com
Date: 04 Oct 2000 20:05:55 -0700
Cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Cc: csapuntz@cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: "Douglas Otis"'s message of "Wed, 4 Oct 2000 17:42:12 -0700"
References: <NEBBJGDMMLHHCIKHGBEJEEJPCBAA.dotis@sanlight.net>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


> Forgive my ignorance, but is there a reason why a tunneling protocol is not
> used to get past the NAT or Firewall?  Why is there a gateway-in specific to
> only this protocol?

It's actually my ignorance, Doug. I don't know of an applicable
tunneling protocol.

The only widely deployed tunneling/proxy protocol I know of is
HTTP/FTP proxies.

-Costa

References:
- RE: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
  - From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis@sanlight.net>

Prev by Date: RE: iSCSI: Flow Control
Next by Date: Re: iSCSI: URL scheme
Prev by thread: RE: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
Next by thread: Re: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:50 2001
6315 messages in chronological order