iSCSI: Alternatives to Urgent Pointer "pseudo-Framing"

To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: iSCSI: Alternatives to Urgent Pointer "pseudo-Framing"
From: "Dante Malagrino'" <dantem@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:07:56 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20001116064854.00bbda80@hpindlm.cup.hp.com>
References: <OF90FE544E.7184BA90-ON88256999.0018FC9B@LocalDomain>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

Folks,

I have a general question for this group. Are we allowed to define a new 
TCP option, to be used for iSCSI framing? Otherwise, can the group work in 
collaboration with some other IETF-WG's for this purpose?

-- Dante

Dante Malagrino'
Cisco Systems                  Empowering the Internet Generation
170 West Tasman Drive                         Tel. (408) 525 4120
San Jose, CA, 95134-1706                      Fax. (408) 525 4120
                                                  dantem@cisco.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: iSCSI: Alternatives to Urgent Pointer "pseudo-Framing"
  - From: Matt Wakeley <matt_wakeley@agilent.com>

References:
- Re: iSCSI: Urgent Pointer Negotation
  - From: "John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM" <hufferd@us.ibm.com>
- Re: iSCSI: Urgent Pointer Negotation
  - From: Michael Krause <krause@cup.hp.com>

Prev by Date: Re: iSCSI: Urgent Pointer Negotation
Next by Date: timers
Prev by thread: Re: iSCSI: Urgent Pointer Negotation
Next by thread: Re: iSCSI: Alternatives to Urgent Pointer "pseudo-Framing"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:24 2001
6315 messages in chronological order