|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Alternatives to Urgent Pointer "pseudo-Framing"Your mailbox is going to hate you for asking that. Simple answer - no, this WG is not allowed to define a new TCP option. -Matt Dante Malagrino' wrote: > Folks, > > I have a general question for this group. Are we allowed to define a new > TCP option, to be used for iSCSI framing? Otherwise, can the group work in > collaboration with some other IETF-WG's for this purpose? > > -- Dante > > Dante Malagrino' > Cisco Systems Empowering the Internet Generation > 170 West Tasman Drive Tel. (408) 525 4120 > San Jose, CA, 95134-1706 Fax. (408) 525 4120 > dantem@cisco.com
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:24 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |