|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iFCPIMHO, the most interesting thing about this proposal is that "SAN"s can be had without a single FC switch anywhere. This is quite different from bridging FC switch based SANs over IP. All the n*n stuff can happen in IP based switches without changing hosts or devices (in theory ;-). The "edge connects" do the conversion for hosts and devices. -- mark "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" wrote: > > With my HP hat off :-) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Hufferd [mailto:hufferd@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 5:51 PM > > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > > Subject: iFCP > ..snip.. > > In this FC SAN to FC SAN environment, the thing that I find interesting > is > > that the iFCP protocol will Encapsulate each FC "Session" separately > > instead of Tunneling all the "Sessions" that arrive on a single FC cable > to > > a single remote Target. This means that Each "Session" can > > be individually routed by normal IP routing techniques. > > > > The reason I think this is interesting is that SAN Edge > > connect Devices (Gateways) when used with Tunneling requires (n*(n-1)) > Edge > > Connects, where n is the number of SANs being interconnected. That is, 2 > SAN > > needs 2 Edge Connects (ECs), 3 SANs need 6 ECs, 4 SANs need 12 ECs, 5 > need > > 20 ECs, etc. The Encapsulation techniques of iFCP, on the other > > hand, require only "n" ECs. (A significant difference). This maybe > very > > useful for companies that have a lot of distributed FC based systems. > > Please explain how you've arrived at this notion of tunneling (FCoverIP) > requiring n*(n-1) "edge connects" and what you mean by "edge connects". > > Implementation experience is a pair of "edge devices" (FCoverIP switching > devices) for a WAN link between remote SANs. This is a proximity > requirement only - ie, you have to have a physical device at a location to > connect to the local physical wiring(s). So if there are several SANs at a > physical location, it still requires only one FCoverIP device (with N FC > ports) to handle the WAN connection. > > Marjorie Krueger > Networked Storage Architecture > Hewlett-Packard Storage Organization > tel: +1 916 785 2656 > fax: +1 916 785 0391 > email: marjorie_krueger@hp.com
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:20 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |