Re: NOP-Out clarification

[julian_satran@il.ibm.com]

JP,

The consesus at the intermediate meeting in Orlando was to drop Data
Numbering.
If you have strong object here is your last chance to object.

Also Data Numbering was meant only for incoming data and it is per command
("less than a task" if you take in account linked commands).

Regards,
Julo


Please respond to Raghavendra Rao <jp.raghavendra@sun.com>

To:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
cc:
Subject:  NOP-Out clarification





My reading of NOP-out as used for data-in acknowledgements is that
it is for the entire task - Not per R2T since I don't see offset/length
in the NOP-out header. Is my assumption correct ? It would be nice
if the draft can be more explicit.

Thanks.

-JP