|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: NOP-Out clarificationAshish, TCP already guarantees data delivery. Data Numbering was there to enable long running input operation to recover faster (repeating only unacked data after a restart). And many members of this list (not all) felt it was adding to much complexity for what it bought. As for scoreboarding in all SCSI protocols the target is supposed to do its job and the delivery subsystem to deliver. The initiator is not supposed to do scoreboarding (it can do for completeness but it is not required to) and has to report exceptions (including counters for overrun/underrun) as they where conveyed by the target. Julo "Choubal, Ashish" <ashish.choubal@intel.com> on 19/01/2001 02:07:46 Please respond to "Choubal, Ashish" <ashish.choubal@intel.com> To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL cc: Subject: RE: NOP-Out clarification Hi Julian, Scraping Data Numbering will affect how single-initiator-command - multiple data response PDU case is handled. My understanding was that the data numbering mechanism allowed the initiator not to do any score-boarding and put the burden on the target to guarantee that all data requested by initiator was delivered - i.e. target numbers the each of response data PDU and initiator acknowledges it received the PDU via a NOP. When target receives acknowledgements for all the DataRN's it sent, then it sends a status info to complete the command. What am I missing? -Ashish Choubal -----Original Message----- From: julian_satran@il.ibm.com [mailto:julian_satran@il.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 3:51 PM To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: NOP-Out clarification JP, The consesus at the intermediate meeting in Orlando was to drop Data Numbering. If you have strong object here is your last chance to object. Also Data Numbering was meant only for incoming data and it is per command ("less than a task" if you take in account linked commands). Regards, Julo Please respond to Raghavendra Rao <jp.raghavendra@sun.com> To: ips@ece.cmu.edu cc: Subject: NOP-Out clarification My reading of NOP-out as used for data-in acknowledgements is that it is for the entire task - Not per R2T since I don't see offset/length in the NOP-out header. Is my assumption correct ? It would be nice if the draft can be more explicit. Thanks. -JP
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:48 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |