|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Ordered delivery capability notificationA better solution is to change "SHOULD deliver the commands to the target SCSI layer in the order specified by CmdSN" to "MUST". -Matt Pierre Labat wrote: > > Julian, > > Where: > ====== > > 1.2.2.1 Command numbering > > "iSCSI supports ordered command delivery within a session" > > "The target iSCSI layer SHOULD deliver the commands to the target > SCSI layer in the order specified by CmdRN". > > Problem: > ======= > An initiator is unable to know if the iSCSI target layer support ordered > > command delivery. Hence it cannot trust iSCSI to have ordered delivery. > > Hence all the iSCSI ordering mechanism becomes useless because > it can't be trusted. > The problem is not that iSCSI target layers can't support ordered > delivery, > the problem is that the initiator/application doesn't know anything > about it. > > Solution: > ====== > > a) Add a Login/Text key > Ordered:<yes|no> > > b) Put the explanation in for the key: > "If the target answered "yes" and is unable to maintain the order for > whatever reason, it must notify the initiator and drop the session" > > If the target answered "yes", when it receives a "retried" command > (retry bit), > it must be able to retry the command in such a way that the effect > on the initiator and target device when the command completes > is the same as if the command would have not needed to be retried. > This doesn't mean always restart from where left, a READ > can have all the data re-transmitted because it is transparent > a completion time.
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:45 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |