Re: iscsi: editorial comments to iSCSI-05

[julian_satran@il.ibm.com]

Matt,

I fixed those that MUST and did not those that MUST NOT -:)

Julo

Matt Wakeley <matt_wakeley@agilent.com> on 11/03/2001 09:54:57

Please respond to Matt Wakeley <matt_wakeley@agilent.com>

To:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
cc:
Subject:  Re: iscsi: editorial comments to iSCSI-05




I understand this, but it's not consistent.  For example, on page 15:

"data and the status for a command must be sent over the same TCP
connection
that was used to deliver the SCSI command."  and in the very same
paragraph,
"the target MUST return R2T, if any, and the status over the same TCP
connection" These are requirements, but must is sometimes capitalized,
sometimes not.

And on page 56: "The target MUST not set the Status to 0x'0000'", the must
is
capitalized, but the not is not.

-Matt



Black_David@emc.com wrote:
>
> > Global:  "MUST", "SHOULD", etc are sometimes all upper case,
> >     sometimes lowercase.  Please make them consistent.
>
> Actually, that's deliberate.  Upper case versions of these
> and other terms express requirements, recommendations, and
> options for interoperability and the like and are defined
> in RFC 2119 (see statement on p.3 of the iSCSI draft).  Lower
> case versions of these terms may be used, but do not have
> the RFC 2119 meanings and implications of the upper case terms.
> The decision to use upper case vs. lower case is a deliberate
> decision about whether this is an interoperability issue or
> one of similar import/impact - in particular RFC 2119 advises
> that these upper case terms "be used with care and sparingly".
>
> --David
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140     FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
> black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ---------------------------------------------------