RE: Frame Formats

["Ayman Ghanem" <aghanem@cisco.com>]

I would vote in favor of new format-2 (AHS-length in first byte). I find it
simpler and good enough, assuming the 1020 byte limit on AHSs length is not
an issue for other applications.

-Ayman

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
julian_satran@il.ibm.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 7:52 AM
To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Frame Formats




As we have mentioned in our presentation - we need a decision on frame
format soon - to get to do our work.
Barry and myself are OK with both formats.

Please have again a look at them and voice your opinion (with some words to
indicate why if you feel like it).


Thanks,
Julo



"Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> on 27/03/2001 15:32:14

Please respond to "Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net>

To:   Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
cc:
Subject:  Frame Formats




Julian,
     There seems to be no additional discussion about frame formats. What
happens now?

Barry Reinhold
Principal Architect
Trebia Networks
barry.reinhold@trebia.com
603-868-5144/603-659-0885/978-929-0830 x138