|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: Frame FormatsI can accept either format, but I would rather have FORMAT-2 with the lengths always in a fixed location. >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of >julian_satran@il.ibm.com >Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 8:52 AM >To: ips@ece.cmu.edu >Subject: Re: Frame Formats > > > > >As we have mentioned in our presentation - we need a decision on frame >format soon - to get to do our work. >Barry and myself are OK with both formats. > >Please have again a look at them and voice your opinion (with some words to >indicate why if you feel like it). > > >Thanks, >Julo > > > >"Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> on 27/03/2001 15:32:14 > >Please respond to "Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> > >To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL >cc: >Subject: Frame Formats > > > > >Julian, > There seems to be no additional discussion about frame formats. What >happens now? > >Barry Reinhold >Principal Architect >Trebia Networks >barry.reinhold@trebia.com >603-868-5144/603-659-0885/978-929-0830 x138 > > > >
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:15 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |