SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: Parameter Negotiation (draft -05)



    
    
    Steve,
    
    Yes a target may introduce a parameter or continue negotiating. This might
    be the reason it answers
    with F=0 to an initiator that set F=0. As a response the initiator may
    resume negotiating and send text with F=0 or 1.
    In any case a target PDU with F=1 is correct only after an initiator has
    sent a PDU with F=1 except for errors (like a login reject).
    
    Regards,
    Julo
    
    Steve Senum <ssenum@cisco.com> on 29/03/2001 01:38:34
    
    Please respond to Steve Senum <ssenum@cisco.com>
    
    To:   ietf-ips <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
    cc:
    Subject:  iSCSI: Parameter Negotiation (draft -05)
    
    
    
    
    Julian:
    
    I have a question on the following text in section 4.3:
    
     Operational parameter negotiation MAY involve several request-
     response exchanges (login and/or text) always driven by the
     initiator. The initiator MUST indicate its intent to terminate the
     negotiation by setting the F bit to 1; the target sets the F bit to 1
     on the last response. The last response must be the Login Response.
     If the target responds to a text or Login command with the F bit set
     to 1, with a text response with the F bit set to 0, or a login
     response with the text bit set to 0, the initiator must keep sending
     the text command (even empty) with the F bit set to 1 until it gets
     the Login Response with the F bit set to 1.
    
    Is the target allowed to introduce a parameter into the negotiation
    process?  That is, is the following sequence valid:
    
    Text Cmd, F=1 I -> A=<a> B=<b>
    Text Rsp, F=0 T -> A=<a> B=<b> C=<c>
    
    If not, when would the target ever want to
    response with F=1 to a F=0 Text Command in
    the operational parameter negotiation phase?
    
    I know there was a thread on this before, but it was
    not clear to me how it was resolved.
    
    Thanks,
    Steve Senum
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:14 2001
6315 messages in chronological order