|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI Target ResetSuch large targets are also capable of features like target zoning which can restrict the impact caused by host[s] using the target reset.Host environments that deploy such forms of recovery are zoned to avoid disrupting I/O activity from other OS'. This restricts the scope of error recovery while not breaking legacy apps dependent on target reset. I'm aware of at least 2 high end FC arrays (one being the EMC Symmetrix) [and several mid-range arrays] that do support the target reset. - Santosh John Hufferd wrote: > > Absolutely not, Why would we think that impacting 32 different other > initiators is an OK thing to do. By the way there are lots more Initiators > possible with FC on Shark, and would hope that there would be even more > with iSCSI. > > I have been told that these large Storage Controllers do not support Target > Reset today. So I see no loss in not supporting such an item in iSCSI > especially since many Initiators will be beyond even the distances and > mischief that is possible with FC. > > . > . > . > John L. Hufferd > Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) > IBM/SSG San Jose Ca > (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 > Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com > > Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 04/23/2001 01:24:02 PM > > Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu > > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > cc: > Subject: Re: iSCSI Target Reset > > "Dillard, David" wrote: > > > > When will STORPORT be generally available? The latest STORPORT document > > that I found on the MS web site is version 0.6a, dated March 18, 2001. > > Given this it seems like STORPORT might not be available soon. In that > case > > do you know what happens with the current drivers? Are we going to be > > telling customers that if they want to use iSCSI and NT clustering they > have > > to update to Whistler? > > [One would hope that this list does not turn into a Microsoft > release/product discussion mailing list (?) ] > > Without going into specifics of A certain O.S., does it suffice to > require that iSCSI not break existing legacy SCSI applications ? > > If the above is a valid requirement, then, knowing that legacy > applications continue to use SCSI-2 Reserve/Release and the target reset > as a mechanism of breaking SCSI-2 reservations, should'nt iSCSI continue > to support the target reset ? > > - Santosh begin:vcard n:Rao;Santosh tel;work:408-447-3751 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Hewlett Packard, Cupertino.;SISL adr:;;19420, Homestead Road, M\S 43LN, ;Cupertino.;CA.;95014.;USA. version:2.1 email;internet:santoshr@cup.hp.com title:Software Design Engineer x-mozilla-cpt:;21088 fn:Santosh Rao end:vcard
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:54 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |