SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI Target Reset



    Shark does indeed support Target Reset. According to the Shark reference
    manual, a Target Reset has the effect of performing a LUN Reset on each
    LUN surfaced on the port. Interestingly, for FC (and not for parallel
    SCSI), Shark surfaces all LUNs on all ports (there are ACLs per LUN), so
    I assume a Target Reset has the unfortunate effect of reseting the
    entire Shark...
    
    John Hufferd wrote:
    > 
    > Absolutely not,  Why would we think that impacting 32 different other
    > initiators is an OK thing to do.  By the way there are lots more Initiators
    > possible with FC on Shark, and would hope that there would be even more
    > with iSCSI.
    > 
    > I have been told that these large Storage Controllers do not support Target
    > Reset today.  So I see no loss in not supporting such an item in iSCSI
    > especially since many Initiators will be beyond even the distances and
    > mischief that is possible with FC.
    > 
    > .
    > .
    > .
    > John L. Hufferd
    > Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
    > IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
    > (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
    > Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
    > 
    > Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 04/23/2001 01:24:02 PM
    > 
    > Sent by:  owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > 
    > To:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > cc:
    > Subject:  Re: iSCSI Target Reset
    > 
    > "Dillard, David" wrote:
    > >
    > > When will STORPORT be generally available?  The latest STORPORT document
    > > that I found on the MS web site is version 0.6a, dated March 18, 2001.
    > > Given this it seems like STORPORT might not be available soon.  In that
    > case
    > > do you know what happens with the current drivers?  Are we going to be
    > > telling customers that if they want to use iSCSI and NT clustering they
    > have
    > > to update to Whistler?
    > 
    > [One would hope that this list does not turn into a Microsoft
    > release/product discussion mailing list (?) ]
    > 
    > Without going into specifics of A certain O.S., does it suffice to
    > require that iSCSI not break existing legacy SCSI applications ?
    > 
    > If the above is a valid requirement, then, knowing that legacy
    > applications continue to use SCSI-2 Reserve/Release and the target reset
    > as a mechanism of breaking SCSI-2 reservations, should'nt iSCSI continue
    > to support the target reset ?
    > 
    > - Santosh
    
    -- 
    Mark Mokryn      SANgate Systems Inc.      mark@SANgate.com
    Phone: +972-9-8919821                Mobile: +972-54-270030
    Fax: +972-9-8919449                  http://www.SANgate.com
    P.O. Box 1486 41 Hameyasdim St., Even Yehuda 40500 Israel
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:54 2001
6315 messages in chronological order