|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Send Targets and Report Portal GroupsJoe, > Initiators that only need to discover a single target name/address are not > helped much by SendTargets. They are if they don't already know the target's name, and there is not a default operational target. I do think that single target end points are going to be a common case. The question is whether you require the initiator to know the network address (probably just IP address or name) AND the target name, or just the network address. If you have a default operational target, OR if you provide SendTargets, you only need to know the network address. Otherwise, you need to know the target name too. Personally, I think that requiring that an initiator know both the address and the target name (OR requiring an N/D service) is a mistake. It means an administrator must be able to find each target's address through a side channel. If the target is racked into a large system, you probably won't be able to read it off the box itself, and it may not have an appropriate console or other facility from which to interrogate the target. I'll renew my claim that to get started in iSCSI, it shouldn't be necessary to have additional `enterprise-class' resources (i.e. a complete N/D service). It should be easy to stage a SMALL configuration by just: 1) configuring the initiator to be a network citizen 2) configuring the target(s) to be a network citizen 3) pointing the initiator at the target This is analogous to what PL_DA offered for FC. Certainly, much of the sizzle of FC is in the larger network case, but first people put together PL_DA configurations (and products), before deciding it was time to try something bigger. In other words, we need either SendTargets OR a default operational target (and I say why not both?) to support this simple case. We shouldn't throw BOTH of these out. Steph
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:31 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |