Re: iSCSI: minor editorial request

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

Sandeep,

OK for the description. The name change involves perhaps some other changes
and It is consistent with the field usage in other PDUs (with a similar
treatement) and I would suggest is stays as is.

Julo



sandeepj@research.bell-labs.com (Sandeep Joshi) on 25-07-2001 21:08:10

Please respond to sandeepj@research.bell-labs.com (Sandeep Joshi)

To:   Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
cc:
Subject:  iSCSI: minor editorial request





Julian,

Minor request..

The text for expDataSN/expR2TSN fields in SCSI response.
(Sec 2.4.7 and Sec 2.4.8) could be reworded to avoid
confusion (this happened at the plugfest)

The description currently states
   "One past the largest DataSN in an input data PDU..."

Could be restated as
   "The number of read PDUs which were sent.."

I wonder if the field name in SCSI response could also
be changed to "numDataSN" (old=expDataSN) and "numR2TSN"
(old=expR2TSN) to signify this.

thanks,
-Sandeep