|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Case-sensitivity in iSCSI namesGlen, Perhaps I have this wrong, but I think what we are talking about is a Name that gets Generated via some sort of Management Tool. Then the iSCSI Initiator, or the iSCSI Target saves the string that the Management or Discovery process gives to them. This String is then suppose to be able to be use in simple comparisons. That is it is the TargetID or InitiatorID, may save the string to be used during negations. If the manufacture assigns the name, it will also be inserted into the unit via some kind of interactive Tool. I do not understand why the Target or Initiator needs to have the purifying function called "NAMEPREP". This function should be done on the interactive Tool/Management routine, on which the Administrator, (or Manufacture) uses to enter the name. So I can not see that this causes us any significant problems, and it helps the Admin ease of use, and a help in reducing finger ck errors. Please set me straight if I have this wrong. . John L. Hufferd Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) IBM/SSG San Jose Ca Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 Home Office (408) 997-6136 Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com Glen Turner <glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au>@ece.cmu.edu on 07/25/2001 01:03:40 AM Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS cc: IPS <ips@ece.cmu.edu> Subject: Re: iSCSI: Case-sensitivity in iSCSI names John Hufferd wrote: > > I want to jump on this bandwagon too. This seems to be exactly the right > approach. I'm showing some caution. It seems that NAMEPREP still requires casing tables. Where and how are these maintained? Does the proposal lead to language-based variants of iSCSI products. At the moment I can safely buy a hard disk drive from the USA and use it anywhere in the world: IDE, FC or SCSI. That should be so for iSCSI. Mark wrote: > Anyway, if this is to be used for domain names, we ought to use it, > too. Except that no-one is suggesting embedding DNS in a platform that won't be maintained after sale. Before support one way or the other I'd like to be clearer about the boundaries of iSCSI naming. Regards, Glen -- Glen Turner Network Engineer (08) 8303 3936 Australian Academic and Research Network glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au http://www.aarnet.edu.au/ -- The revolution will not be televised, it will be digitised
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:12 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |