SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI: draft 7: iSCSI response and SCSI sense data



    > Could you please quote us which part of SAM-2 this is 
    > violating.
    
    As Rob Elliott said:
    
    > Furthermore, SAM-2 requires that status be ignored when the service
    > response indicates an error (SAM-2 revision 18 section 5.1):
    >   "Status: A one-byte field containing command completion status
    >   (see 5.3). If the command ends with a service response of
    >   SERVICE DELIVERY OR TARGET FAILURE, the application client
    >   shall consider this parameter to be undefined."
    >
    > I think iSCSI's current wording may violate this rule.
    
    So, just generate the CHECK CONDITION and don't try to use the
    iSCSI Service Response to further qualify it, as Mallikarjun
    suggests:
    
    > Robert Elliott pointed out a violation by iSCSI in trying to 
    > additionally qualify ASC, ASCQ with its response codes.  I suggest 
    > that dropping this "additional description" attempt in all these 
    > cases is all iSCSI needs to do to meet SAM's expectations.
    
    Thanks,
    --David
    
    ---------------------------------------------------
    David L. Black, Senior Technologist
    EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
    +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140     FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
    black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
    ---------------------------------------------------
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:07 2001
6315 messages in chronological order