RE: iSCSI: reusing ISID for recovery

["Somesh Gupta" <someshg@yahoo.com>]

In case we start counting votes, A is my answer.
If someone is lost, they are lost. Machines don't
have anywhere near Julian's IQ and my programs
are even worse.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
> Stephen Bailey
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:53 PM
> To: Santosh Rao
> Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: Re: iSCSI: reusing ISID for recovery 
> 
> 
> > The same was earlier proposed by myself in a previous thread on this
> > issue a few months ago.
> 
> You're not the only one.  I'm also in favor of (A).  I have also
> carefully laid out the chain that Marjorie's following on at least one
> (and probably several) past occasions.  It seems sound to me.  An
> initiator that has lost its mind (this might be an OS reboot, or
> `simply' a fat adapter crash & restart) is going to want to stomp out
> any existing sessions in its name.  It's not going to want to pick up
> old context unless it's aware that there IS old context, in which case
> it hasn't completely lost its mind.
> 
> I've been keeping my mouth shut in hopes that it would actually pass,
> but I guess I don't have to articulate a position so much as just hold
> it to ensure it gets killed.  Given my track record, I'm now for sale
> to the highest bidder.
> 
> Steph

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com