|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Markers"Mark S. Edwards" wrote: > > At 09:51 AM 1/11/2002 -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > >Apart from taking a position on 1-5, we need to take a position on > >mandatory vs. optional to implement. > > > >I don't have strong views right now on which of 1-5 is best for those > >who want to cast their iSCSI protocol processing into silicon. But I > >do have views on what these things cost in software, so for any of > >options 1..4 I would object to a "mandatory to implement" requirement. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Ditto. > > Mark. I concur. --Matt
Home Last updated: Fri Jan 11 17:17:49 2002 8368 messages in chronological order |