|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI: NOP-InThe implied use for data is to echo it. Julo
BTW, What is the reason for a Target Ping not to carry any data? Eddy -----Original Message----- From: John Hufferd [mailto:hufferd@us.ibm.com] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 3:10 PM To: Julian Satran Cc: ips; owner-ips; ""Robert D. Russell" <rdr" Subject: Re: iSCSI: NOP-In Julian, you are of course correct. My implied (though perhaps not so well written) point was that a ping INITIATED by the target, is also possible, but can not have data. And that the removal of the word "ping" would perhaps prevent that concept from being obvious. . . . John L. Hufferd Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) IBM/SSG San Jose Ca Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702 Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com Julian Satran@IBMIL 05/12/2002 04:47 AM To: John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS@IBMDE cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu, "Robert D. Russell" <rdr@io.iol.unh.edu> From: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL Subject: Re: iSCSI: NOP-In (Document link: John Hufferd) John. Ping from target is prohibited from having data only if TTT is 0xfffffffff i.e., when no reply request is requested. Julo John Hufferd@IBMUS To: "Robert D. Russell" <rdr@io.iol.unh.edu> cc: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, ips@ece.cmu.edu, 05/10/2002 12:53 <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu> AM From: John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS Subject: Re: iSCSI: NOP-In(Document link: Julian Satran - Mail) You may be correct, but I think we need to use the Ping word, so that it becomes obvious, as it does now, that Ping from Initiator can have data but ping from Target can not. . . . John L. Hufferd Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) IBM/SSG San Jose Ca Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403, eFax: (408) 904-4688 Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702 Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
Home Last updated: Mon May 13 13:18:28 2002 10093 messages in chronological order |