RE: iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks

["Eddy Quicksall" <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>]

Then I assume 10.14.5 should also include item D which is in 6.5.

Eddy

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu; owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks



there are no ordering issues in case d. The termination is "brutal" -
the whole session disappear. In the other cases
some ordering side effects must be considered.

Julo



"Eddy Quicksall" <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


06/01/03 15:16


Please respond to
<Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>


To
<ips@ece.cmu.edu>

cc

Subject
iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks







There are two sections titled Implicit Termination of Tasks but they are
slightly different. Which is correct?

Section 6.5 lists 4 items but section 10.14.5 only lists two [correction -
three].

If 6.5 is correct, why is item D not included in the unit attention?
SAM-3 says:

5.7.2 When a SCSI initiator port aborts its own tasks
When a SCSI initiator port causes its own task(s) to be aborted, no
notification that the task(s) have been aborted
shall be returned to the SCSI initiator port other than the completion
response for the command or task
management function action that caused the task(s) to be aborted and
notification(s) associated with related
effects of the action (e.g., a reset unit attention condition).

Eddy