|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: Concensus Call on Urgent Pointer.Clive, You are welcome to exhibit such an alternative mechanism. Randy Haagens Director, Networked Storage Architecture Storage Organization Hewlett-Packard Co. e-mail: Randy_Haagens@hp.com tel: +1 916 785 4578 fax: +1 916 785 0391 -----Original Message----- From: Clive Philbrick [mailto:clive@alacritech.com] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:03 PM To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: Concensus Call on Urgent Pointer. We too are prepared to support an URGENT mechanism that includes negotiation and that is "making it an option for both sides". It is worth pointing out that since the whole thrust of the mechanism is solely to attempt to deal with dropped frames in a efficient manner in a TCP offload environment, there are already working alternatives out there that effectively deal with dropped frames in these environments. They do not need the URGENT mechanism, nor do they have huge SRAM resources. That said, it is conceivable that an URGENT mechanism could help, although it would not be considered low hanging fruit in terms of performance gains expected. Clive Philbrick Alacritech
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:22 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |