Re: IPS: Schedule and Security Update

To: Sandeep Joshi <sandeepj@research.bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: IPS: Schedule and Security Update
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
cc: Black_David@emc.com, ips@ece.cmu.edu
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <3B7AFC0D.C4170901@research.bell-labs.com>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

> So does your answer imply that the iSCSI RFC status will depend 
> on the result of the IPSec-NAT work item in the IPSec WG ?
> 

The answer depends on whether that work is cited normatively or
non-normatively. I would suggest that it is desirable to have as few
normative references as possible in a document that we hope to have done
ASAP.

References:
- Re: IPS: Schedule and Security Update
  - From: Sandeep Joshi <sandeepj@research.bell-labs.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Crc-32c example in iSCSI spec]
Next by Date: RE: iSCSI: draft 7: remove S bit and Status field from the Data-i
Prev by thread: Re: IPS: Schedule and Security Update
Next by thread: IPS Interim Meeting: Preliminary Agenda
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:01 2001
6315 messages in chronological order