|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: IPS: FCIP & this listRalph, > There are minutes (well, more like discussion notes) from the > conference call and I will ask that they be posted to this > reflector. That'll be an improvement, thanks. Discussion notes are exactly the sort of thing that should to be visible on this reflector. > The interim FCIP drafts and issues lists are maintained in PDF > format, amounting to between .2M and .5M of new material per > week. Since this is Rome, they cannot be posted to this reflector. > It is totally impractical to translate the PDFs to text, sorry. That's a judgment call. Actually sending the PDFs to the list or the I-D servers is a no-no, but it would be ok to put them on a web site and post URLs to the list, as long as new text versions of the draft do go to the I-D servers at reasonable intervals. It would also be ok to keep the interim PDF versions private among the authors until the next major revision of the draft is ready for the I-D servers. There's no requirement to make all working notes visible. I do need to clarify one point of process: > I doubt that the > WG Last Calls time requirement would be shortened by more than > 10% even if everything done by the FCIP authors was posted > to this reflector. In particular, I see no reason to believe > that the people who will raise Last Call issues will remember > earlier postings here, or bother to participate on this > reflector prior to Last Call. My concern is that the existence of prior discussion on this reflector can be a significant factor in whether an issue raised in WG Last Call causes the Last Call to fail. If one can point to prior discussion or even acceptance without discussion on this list of a technical approach that is questioned during WG Last Call, then such an issue may be resolvable by pointing to that discussion and indicating that the WG considered the alternative and has rough consensus to proceed as currently specified. OTOH, if the issue is new to the reflector and technically valid, the odds of the WG Last Call failing are significantly increased. WG Last Call periods are measured in weeks (at least 2, but the initial WG Last Call period for each of the main protocol drafts is likely to be longer). If a WG Last Call fails, the draft has to be revised, and the WG Last Call repeated; we went through one of these cycles with the iSCSI requirements draft. Thanks, --David --------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140 FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:03:56 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |